Thanks to Chad for giving me the head's up on this, but it looks as though the serial killer I have been preaching about for about a decade now has struck again.
This is how it is every time. 20-something college male goes missing, ends up in river. I like how drunk males found ways to not end up corpses in rivers for thousands of years, and now there are what 15 or 20 since about 1998 or so in the Upper Midwest--a relatively regionally specific phenomenon--but this is mere coincidence.
Do college kids in Alabama not drink within 20 miles of bodies of water? What about in Oregon?
Now I don't necessarily buy into that jibber-jabber about there being a gang of serial killers or that the initial incident in New York that the detectives on the case are trying to link to the midwestern cases is tied in at all, but for fuck's sake there is no way this is all coincidental.
5 comments:
If you are asking for knowledge from an insider, I believe that college kids in Oregon mostly drink indoors.
Which is where these upper midwestern kids are drinking, too. I'm guessing there's no problem with Oregonian youngsters drinking and ending up dead in rivers.
I imagine the police chief in La Crosse is happy it didn't happen there, imagine the explaining he would have to do....so is your theory still it is a homicidal shemale?
I don't remember that being my theory, but it sure sounds like something a) brilliant, and b) I would have said. So since it is both of those things, I shall take it as my own and run with it.
i remember during my college days in oregon hearing about a serious scary group that was made up of transient types that entered campuses and looked for there new members or victims this was out of eugene oregon and i think there was a female witness to some of there activitys but she went into hiding and refused to testify they left smileys all over walls on campus
Post a Comment