Showing posts with label Chris Hemsworth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chris Hemsworth. Show all posts

Monday, May 7, 2012

Man on Film: The Avengers

About two weeks ago, I was a little down on Joss Whedon following my tepid response to The Cabin in the Woods, a film that he co-wrote with former Buffy scribe Drew Goddard. Today, I couldn't be more pleased with Joss Whedon.

It is with little hesitation that I say The Avengers is the best movie I've seen in this young year, and there has not been another one close.

Having written the screenplay and directed the film (with Zak Penn sharing a "Story by" credit), Joss Whedon took his first big shot at directing a big-budget feature*, and he fucking crushed it. Of all of the Marvel movies, this is the best. It's better than Spider-Man 2 and X-2. It's better than either of the Iron Man flicks.

*The budget for Serenity was just $40 million compared to the reported $220 million that The Avengers cost.

What Joss Whedon has done is crafted the most complete film of the Marvel adaptations. I suppose some of this owes to the fact that a lot of the origin legwork was done on the primary characters. After two Iron Man films, two somewhat related/muddled Hulk films, a Thor film, and a Captain America one, the origins of each of the main characters has pretty much been told. Sure, there's the matter of bringing them all together, which does require a good deal of exposition, but most moviegoers--even the non-comic book reading ones--knew the characters individually coming into the film. That said, there is just enough development of characters within the construct of the film as it stands to not turn off those who have seen the films while still establishing the characters for the viewer who may not be familiar with any of the characters, with Whedon having successfully toed that fine line.

The bulk of Whedon's success comes in his feel for each character. His strengths have always lain in his firm grasp of character motivation and development. While these characters already come developed for the most part, Whedon knows these characters so well that it's hard to fathom someone else taking a run at this film and being as successful. His grasp on Bruce Banner, Steve Rogers, Tony Stark, and Thor is always evident. Moreover his love for these characters is ever-present. It is this love of character when combined with his sharp wit that brings this film to the levels it reaches. If ever there were trepidation about whether Whedon was best suited for this venture, every time Downey opens his mouth it is obvious that Whedon should be penning Tony Stark's dialogue and that this is the stage Whedon should be working on. More so than in either of the other films in which the Hulk was present, here he is finally drawn up in a way that gets to the heart of what makes the character interesting. Perhaps some of this owes to Mark Ruffalo's natural affability combined with his ability to approach the role without ego, but for once, the Hulk and his human counterpart Bruce Banner are penned in an engaging, and shockingly funny way.

Speaking of funny, holy shit is this movie funny. Downey's rapier wit is utilized at full blast. There are physical gags that read neither broad nor campy. There are countless character-driven jokes. There were moments when--in the very real need to cut tension--the crowd is left roaring with laughter. Whedon's work here is top-notch.

As for the glitz and glamour of the action film, it is at attention and is equipped with all the bells and whistles. When the lens isn't trained on Scarlett Johansson's bodacious curves (this is the best she's looked in quite some time, and at no point did she irritate me, a small feat), it is framing some pretty spectacular action sequences. Sure, there's a reliance upon CGI that leaves some of the shots ever so slightly cold, but at this point that's almost to be expected. The climactic battle scene over New York City used CGI heavily, but it didn't feel like the film suffered for it. That battle sequence was breathtakingly choreographed, and its grandiosity befit the scale it was trying to achieve.

I could continue to heap praise on the movie--I haven't even mentioned Chris Evans or Jeremy Renner or Clark Gregg or the improved Chris Hemsworth--but it would simply be more of the same. The Avengers, in a word, was awesome.

Friday, May 20, 2011

Man on Film: Thor

As I started to assess what lay ahead of me in my attempt to catch up here, I was bowled over by how far behind I've fallen. Some of this is related to baseball. Some the added distraction that my new iPhone has brought to my life. Regardless my attention has been drawn elsewhere over the past month or two.

In my attempt to get back up to speed, I'll start with the easiest film for me to review: Thor.

To sum it up in a word?

Unimpressed.

As is often the case for the first outing in a superhero franchise, much of the first hour is spent setting up that hero's origin. In some instances, like Spider-Man or Iron Man, this is the best part of the film, after which the hero is clumsily pitted against his foe who makes an appearance in the first act but whose true, evil nature is merely alluded to through foreshadowing. While the conflict with the villain is actually set up pretty well in this film, Thor's origin story is neither compelling nor entertaining.

The screenplay, credited to three scribes--Ashley Edward Miller, Zack Stentz (the writing partners who brought you Agent Cody Banks and six episodes of Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles), and Don Payne (one of the two credited screenwriters of Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer)--starts off with Thor crashing down to the New Mexican desert in the midst of an aurora. After a ten-minute teaser, the film takes a leap back to Thor's home planet, Asgard. For what felt like an hour. All of this time is spent showing the young Norse God to be the equivalent of the dumb fucking jock who wants to crush everything and who everybody hated in high school (unless, of course, you were that dumb fucking jock). Not only is Thor an ill-mannered, spoiled rich jock, but he is gifted with all of the entitlement issues and egotism of J.D. McCoy, the pissant quarterback who unseats Matt Saracen in the third season of Friday Night Lights.

Not only is the Thor we get to know for the first 90 minutes of the film all of these things, but the set-up of the origin of Thor happens to take place in a place that looks, well, ridiculous. Asgard looked like shit. Take all of the things that you hated about the "sets" in the Star Wars prequels and lump them together. That's Asgard. 45 minutes of film are shot in green screen and the backgrounds are added later. Maybe I'm being excessively purist, but the complete and utter lack of anything real for that long is simply exhausting.

When the audience is finally granted exit from the puerile happenings in Asgard, the next 45 minutes is some amalgamation of Crocodile Dundee, Project X, and Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat with a dash of Donnie Darko-wormholery sprinkled in. By the time Thor has discovered the error of his ways and redemptively reinvented himself, it is hard to believe that a director with as much storytelling skill as Kenneth Branagh was at the helm for this mess of a movie. They shoe-horned a love story into the film while only giving themselves 60% of a film to lay the groundwork for it. Then the audience is supposed to believe that Thor and Jane Foster (Natalie Portman, whose post-Black Swan releases have really been cashing in on that Oscar that she had to have thought she was going to get) fell in love after having spent part of three days together.

These films aren't supposed to be flawless. If anyone understands that, it's me. It just seems that they got almost nothing correct here. For starters, is there anyone who would have been better suited to play Thor than Alexander Skarsgard? Hell, they even cast his father in the film. Instead, they get some Australian soap star, probably to appeal to the Crocodile Dundee demographic. Then the film is constructed in such a way that it is hard to actually give a damn about the protagonist until the 90 minute mark. Everything that happens in any of the worlds other than Earth looks stupid and will only look worse as more time passes and the effects look more and more ridiculous. And I haven't even touched the anticlimactic climax of the film.

What else is there to say? Thor is a lackluster superhero flick that fails to engage until it is far too late.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...